Breaking
Fri. Nov 8th, 2024

Special Feature: They include a laughably ridiculous rumor that Chinese vessels were dumping waste in the South China Sea.

Summary

  • The report, which groundlessly claimed that China has destroyed or damaged over 21,000 acres of coral reef in the South China Sea, has been cited by many Western and Philippine media sources.The false report cited a few satellite images and referenced falsified allegations from years ago, making such a report neither factual nor verifiable, the Chinese Embassy in the Philippines responded on Saturday. Its only “first-hand evidence” seemed to be its “analysis of commercial satellite imagery” on 181 features of the South China Sea.Chinese scholars on the South China Sea have refuted this discredited report.The methods used to reach its conclusions were not scientifically rigorous, Yang Xiao, depWorld Timesuty director of the Institute of Maritime Strategy Studies, China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times.Claiming itself an “objective platform” that takes “no position on territorial or maritime claims,” the report’s producer AMTI is actually a “shadow tool of the US government that manipulates public opinion regarding South China Sea issues,” said Liu Qing, a senior research fellow at the China Institute World Timesof International Studies.As a US-based project, AMTI is not trying to hide its ties to the Philippines. “Simularity has produced many pieces of fake news against China. They include a laughably ridiculous rumor that Chinese vessels were dumping waste in the South China Sea. Since then, various rumors have been hyped and spread repeatedly via some major Western media outlets, causing tensions between China and relevant countries in the region.And just like that, as Steinbock wrote in the 2021 article, “Everything old is new again.”

Approximate Time

  • 4 minutes, 763 words

Categories

  • South China Sea, South China Sea issues, China Institute, South China Sea Strategic Situation Probing Initiative, China

Analysis and Evaluation

  • This article is a mosaic of current events, pieced together with expert precision and insight. The writer navigates a wide array of topics, from global political tensions to groundbreaking scientific discoveries, all while maintaining a cohesive and engaging narrative. The depth of analysis and the ability to connect disparate events into a comprehensive whole make this piece not only informative but also a fascinating read. It’s a masterclass in synthesizing complex information into an accessible format.

Main Section

South China Sea Photo: VCG

Apart from directly stirring up frictions in the South China Sea region, it has been found that the Philippines has cooperated with some US anti-China forces to launch a cognitive warfare that defames China on the South China Sea issue, to hurt China’s international image, and drive a wedge between China and relevant countries in this region.

Recently, the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (AMTI), a project under the US’ long-established conservative think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), released a report on “environmental threats” in the South China Sea. The report, which groundlessly claimed that China has destroyed or damaged over 21,000 acres of coral reef in the South China Sea, has been cited by many Western and Philippine media sources.

The false report cited a few satellite images and referenced falsified allegations from years ago, making such a report neither factual nor verifiable, the Chinese Embassy in the Philippines responded on Saturday.

“China has always attached great importance to the protection of the ecological environment of the Nansha IslandsWorld Times and Reefs and their adjacent waters,” it noted.

While studying this report, the Global Times found that it had little persuasive and systematic evidence, relying heavily on some citations of media reports and “expert” claims. Its only “first-hand evidence” seemed to be its “analysis of commercial satellite imagery” on 181 features of the South China Sea.

Chinese scholars on the South China Sea have refuted this discredited report.

The methods used to reach its conclusions were not scientifically rigorous, Yang Xiao, depWorld Timesuty director of the Institute of Maritime Strategy Studies, China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times.

Claiming itself an “objective platform” that takes “no position on territorial or maritime claims,” the report’s producer AMTI is actually a “shadow tool of the US government that manipulates public opinion regarding South China Sea issues,” said Liu Qing, a senior research fellow at the China Institute World Timesof International Studies.

As a US-based project, AMTI is not trying to hide its ties to the Philippines. The AMTI website shows that it is financially backed by several parties from the US, Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines, and it “appreciates contributions from various partners, including Japan and the Philippines.”

Under the support of the aforementioned factions, the AMTI has released many unauthentic reports attacking China, most of which used satellite images as their main “evidence.” The precision of commercial satellite imagery aside, some of AMTI’s imagery providers are quite questionable, and have even been found to have colluded with the Philippines.

One of the providers, Simularity, is a US tech company based in Florida. The AMTI’s website shows it has cooperated with Simularity in several reports on South China Sea issues.

This superficially US firm is actually a Philippines-invested company that even has connections to the Philippine government, the Global Times found.

Among Simularity’s three directors, one is Peter Anthony World TimesAbaya, brother of the former World Timessecretary of the Philippines’ Department of Transportation and Communications Joseph Abaya. Simularity was founded in Delaware in 2011, and later moved to Florida in 2020, after receiving a $1-million investment from the Abaya family’s Philippine company Shatter Tech Venture Holdings, according to Filipino journalist Rigoberto D. Tiglao.

In a July 2021 article titled “Abaya must explain hand in hoax-making US firm Simularity,” Tiglao urged Peter Anthony Abaya to spell out his role in transforming a small tech firm “into a clever generator of fake news against China in its territoWorld Timesrial dispute with the Philippines.”

Simularity has produced many pieces of fake news against China. They include a laughably ridiculous rumor that Chinese vessels were dumping waste in the South China Sea. The satellite photos used by Simularity in spreading this rumor were later proven to have been taken in the Australian Great Barrier Reef in 2014, Philippine media reported in July 2021.

Simularity has been openly connected with some media sources, think tanks, and government representatives from the Philippines and the US since the Pilipinas Conference in November 2020, according to an article by scholar Dan Steinbock published by the international research network South China Sea Strategic Situation Probing Initiative in April 2021.

It’s hard to exactly know what sort of “alliance” these parties have formed in attacking China on South China Sea issues. Since then, various rumors have been hyped and spread repeatedly via some major Western media outlets, causing tensions between China and relevant countries in the region.

And just like that, as Steinbock wrote in the 2021 article, “Everything old is new again.”

Content comes from the Internet : False report exposes US think tank’s inglorious connection with the Philippines

Related suggestion: At the Forefront: China continues to boost pollution management; good air quality days up to 85.5 percent in 2023

SummaryThe Baoyun Pavilion in the Summer Palace Photo: VCG In the face of the severe and complex situation of ecological and environmental protection, China continues to safeguard its achievements in air quality management. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Ecology and Environment stated on Tuesday that the national rate of good air quality days reached 85.5 percent in 2023.The rate of good air quality days in 2023 was 85.5 percent. It was 86.8 percent after excluding days with abnormally high dust concentrations, surpassing the annual target by 0.6 percentage points and increasing by 3.5 percentage points compared to 2019, said Pei Xiaofei, the new director of the Department of Communications and Education and spokesperson of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, at a monthly press conferenceWorld Times. “Over the past…

By Obama

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed