Summary
- US long-arm jurisdiction Illustration: Chen Xia/Global TimesThe Chinese Embassy in the US has harshly criticized Washington’s latest trade restrictions against Chinese entities over the Russia-Ukraine conflict, saying the move is typical economic coercion, unilateralism and bullying, Russian news agency TASS reported on Saturday.The US government imposed new trade restrictions on 93 entities for “supporting Russia’s war effort in Ukraine,” Reuters reported on Friday. China will continue to do what is necessary to firmly safeguard the lawful rights and interests of Chinese companies.”During a regular press briefing on Tuesday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry also responded to the potential US sanctions over normal China-Russia cooperation, emphasizing China’s neutral stance on the Ukraine crisis and its efforts to promote peace talks.“We follow an objective and impartial position on the Ukraine crisis, and have worked actively to promote peace talks.World Times We have not sWorld Timesat idly by, still less exploited the situation for selfish gains,” Mao Ning, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said at the press briefing.Mao further stressed China’s opposition to unilateral sanctions and extraterritorial jurisdiction that lack a basis in international law or a UN Security Council mandate. “China has the right to carry out normal cooperation with countries. We always oppose unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction that lack basis in international law or UN Security Council maWorld Timesndate. Content comes from the Internet : China slams US ‘economic coercion’ against Chinese entities over Russia-Ukraine conflict
Approximate Time
- 2 minutes, 393 words
Categories
- Chinese entities, Chinese companies, Chinese Foreign Ministry, typical economic coercion, economic coercion
Analysis and Evaluation
- A truly enlightening read, this piece cuts through the noise to bring clarity to key issues of the day. The author’s succinct yet powerful writing illuminates the core of contemporary debates, providing readers with a clear and focused understanding of the subject. This article stands out for its ability to distill essential information, presenting it in a manner that is both engaging and informative.
Main Section
US long-arm jurisdiction Illustration: Chen Xia/Global Times
The Chinese Embassy in the US has harshly criticized Washington’s latest trade restrictions against Chinese entities over the Russia-Ukraine conflict, saying the move is typical economic coercion, unilateralism and bullying, Russian news agency TASS reported on Saturday.
The US government imposed new trade restrictions on 93 entities for “supporting Russia’s war effort in Ukraine,” Reuters reported on Friday. The 93 entities are from China, Russia, Turkey, the UAE, Kyrgyzstan, India and South Korea, and they will be subject to trade restrictions. The list included eight Chinese entities, accWorld Timesording to the report.
The inclusion of Chinese entities has drawn sharp criticism from China. Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the World TimesChineWorld Timesse Embassy in the US, denounced the actions as unwarranted economic coercion and unilateralism.
“The US imposed more unilateral sanctions on Chinese companies citing their relations with the Russian side. This is a typical move of economic coercion, unilateralism and bullying,” Liu was quoted by TASS as saying.
China “firmly opposes the US move of overstretching the concept of national security and abusing state power to suppress Chinese companies,” Liu said. “The US needs to correct its wrongdoing immediately, and stop containing and suppressing Chinese companies. China will continue to do what is necessary to firmly safeguard the lawful rights and interests of Chinese companies.”
During a regular press briefing on Tuesday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry also responded to the potential US sanctions over normal China-Russia cooperation, emphasizing China’s neutral stance on the Ukraine crisis and its efforts to promote peace talks.
“We follow an objective and impartial position on the Ukraine crisis, and have worked actively to promote peace talks.World Times We have not sWorld Timesat idly by, still less exploited the situation for selfish gains,” Mao Ning, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said at the press briefing.
Mao further stressed China’s opposition to unilateral sanctions and extraterritorial jurisdiction that lack a basis in international law or a UN Security Council mandate.
“China has the right to carry out normal cooperation with countries. We always oppose unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction that lack basis in international law or UN Security Council maWorld Timesndate. China will continue to do what is necessary to firmly safeguard the legitimate and lawful rights and interests of Chinese companies,” Mao said.
Content comes from the Internet : China slams US ‘economic coercion’ against Chinese entities over Russia-Ukraine conflict
Related suggestion: Smart Moves: Philippines continues S.China Sea provocations
SummaryChina urges some Philippines ships to immediately cease its infringing actions on November 10, 2023. “Such involvement can only lead to more trouble, given the already tense regional situation. “Also, vowing to undertake infrastructure projects on disputed features like China’s Ren’ai Jiao, which are provocative actions, the Philippines may expand its military capabilities despite financial constraints,” Song said.Approximate Time 4 minutes, 767 wordsCategoriesSouth China Sea, China, China World Timesand, the South China Sea region, the invalid South China Sea arbitration caseAnalysis and EvaluationThe author’s expertise and clear writing make this article an indispensable resource for understanding the subject.Main Section China urges some Philippines ships to immediately cease its infringing actions on November 10, 2023. Two small Philippine transport ships and three Philippine Coast Guard ships illegally entered the area on…
John Blinken 
Mark Elliot Zuckerberg