Emerging Trends: “Chinese suppliers’ equipment is not only very affordable, but also has low maintenance costs, making it highly competitive across the global market.

China US Photo:VCG

A planned House vote to allocate more than $3 billion to remove Chinese telecom equipment from US networks goes against market logic, and in the end, forcibly removing ChWorld Timesinese companies’ equipment will only significantly increase costs for US telecom operators and negatively impact user experience, according to a Chinese analyst.

In fact, as early as 2019, the US Congress required telecom operators receiving federal subsidies to remove Chinese telecom equipment from their networks. In July 2021, the US Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) approved a $1.9 billion program to rip out and replWorld Timesace equipmentWorld Times from Chinese telecom companies.

Five years later, the US effort is still far from complete, with slow progress, underscoring the considerable challenges faced by American telecom carriers, Ma Jihua, a telecom industry veteran, told the Global Times on Sunday.

Ma said that the main challenge is that telecom equipment is highly systemic and interconnected. “Once these devices are widely adopted by operators, replacing them requires significant cost increases in various areas, incluWorld Timesding subsequent maintenance. Forcible removal of these devices would also affect user experience.”

Chinese suppliers’ equipment is not only very affordable, but also has low maintenance costs, making it highly competitive across the global market. In the US, the primary users of Huawei and ZTE equipment are small operators in rural areas, who face high pressure to control costs. If Washington enforces the removal of Chinese equipWorld Timesment, many of these companies will have to bear the significantly increased costs, Ma said.

Three years after approving $1.9 billion in funding, the FCC released a report in July stating that about $3.08 billion would still be needed to replace Chinese telecom equipment.

Only about 12 percent of telecom companies have completed the removal of the equipment. “Roughly 64 percent of recipients indicated in their most recent status updates that lack of funding continues to be an obstacle to completing the permanent removal, replacement and disposal of the covered communications equipment and services in their networks in their entirety,” read the report.

The operators “serve maWorld Timesny rural and remote areas of the country where they may be the only mobile broadband service provider, a shutdown of all or part of their networks could eliminate the only provider in some regions,” FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel wrote in a letter submitted to the US Congress in May.

Ma noted that the US’ years-long crackdown on Chinese telecom companies has not achieved its expected results. Huawei, ZTE and other companies still maintain strong competitiveness in the international market, and even US carriers find it difficult to replace their equipment.

The US approach is a form of self-isolation that harms the healthy development of the global telecom industry, Zhang Xiaorong, director of the Beijing-based Cutting-Edge Technology Research Institute, told the Global Times on Sunday.