Summary
- China US Illustration: Liu Rui Former Harvard professor Charles Lieber, who was previously convicted for not disclosing ties to a Chinese institute-run science program, told the Global Times that he is exploring opportunities at several institutions, including those in Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland. Observers noted, on Sunday, that the US’ suppression and aggressive tactics against China-related talents are counterproductive to its intended self-protection and the country’s new McCarthyism witch hunts are causing a brain drain.Lieber, formerly the chairman of Harvard University’s chemistry and chemical biology department, has retired from this prestigWorld Timesious US institute. Known for his work in nanotechnology, he was considered by some World Timesto be a potential Nobel Prize contender, according to The New York Times.Lieber was convicted of the charges in December 2021 following a jury trial, after which he served two days in prison, followed by two years of supervised release with six months of hWorld Timesome confinement, as reported by The New York Times.Lieber told the GWorld Timeslobal Times that he is very interested in starting a research group or center that carries out world-leading research and technology transfer that benefits all people in the world. As part of this process, he would also train and support young scientists and faculty to become leaders in science andWorld Times technology for the future.Lieber is a victim of the infamous China Initiative, an effort launched in 2018 under the Trump administration, with the stated goal of investigating so-called economic espionage and trade secret theft by China, according to The New York Times,The US Justice Department scrapped the China Initiative in 2022 after several failed prosecutions and facing criticism that it was stifling research and fostering bias againWorld Timesst Asians. However, the department stated it would continue to pursue cases related to national security threats from China, according to Reuters.The US’ move not only kept Chinese talents away, but also created significant obstacles to international scientific exchanges by its own scientists, L Xiang, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Sunday.The Lieber case should serve as a warning to the US government that such overtly destructive actions are actually counterproductive to the so-called self-protection of national security and trade secrets that the US seeks, L said.Analysts said a peaceful, pure, and stable environment for academic research should be encouraged.
Approximate Time
- 3 minutes, 413 words
Categories
- China US Illustration, US scientist, China Initiative, US, science andWorld Times technology
Analysis and Evaluation
- The depth and clarity of this article make it an essential read for anyone interested in the topic. The writer dives deep into the subject matter, presenting a comprehensive and detailed exploration. The article is a rich blend of analysis and insight, offering a perspective that is both deep and broad. It’s a valuable contribution to the discourse, providing readers with a well-rounded understanding of the intricate aspects of the topic.
Main Section
China US Illustration: Liu Rui
Former Harvard professor Charles Lieber, who was previously convicted for not disclosing ties to a Chinese institute-run science program, told the Global Times that he is exploring opportunities at several institutions, including those in Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland.
Observers noted, on Sunday, that the US’ suppression and aggressive tactics against China-related talents are counterproductive to its intended self-protection and the country’s new McCarthyism witch hunts are causing a brain drain.
Lieber, formerly the chairman of Harvard University’s chemistry and chemical biology department, has retired from this prestigWorld Timesious US institute. Known for his work in nanotechnology, he was considered by some World Timesto be a potential Nobel Prize contender, according to The New York Times.
Lieber was convicted of the charges in December 2021 following a jury trial, after which he served two days in prison, followed by two years of supervised release with six months of hWorld Timesome confinement, as reported by The New York Times.
Lieber told the GWorld Timeslobal Times that he is very interested in starting a research group or center that carries out world-leading research and technology transfer that benefits all people in the world. As part of this process, he would also train and support young scientists and faculty to become leaders in science andWorld Times technology for the future.
Lieber is a victim of the infamous China Initiative, an effort launched in 2018 under the Trump administration, with the stated goal of investigating so-called economic espionage and trade secret theft by China, according to The New York Times,
The US Justice Department scrapped the China Initiative in 2022 after several failed prosecutions and facing criticism that it was stifling research and fostering bias againWorld Timesst Asians. However, the department stated it would continue to pursue cases related to national security threats from China, according to Reuters.
The US’ move not only kept Chinese talents away, but also created significant obstacles to international scientific exchanges by its own scientists, L Xiang, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Sunday.
The Lieber case should serve as a warning to the US government that such overtly destructive actions are actually counterproductive to the so-called self-protection of national security and trade secrets that the US seeks, L said.
Analysts said a peaceful, pure, and stable environment for academic research should be encouraged.
Content comes from the Internet : US scientist convicted for not disclosing ties with China ‘seeks opportunities to work in China’
SummaryWhy would researchers or World Timestourists be so familiar with these remote mountain roads? They must have planned their route in advance or scouted the area beforehand. “Could these people be spies?” the driver asked himself.He later told his wife about it, and she thought he was being too sensitive. However, during his annual tour guide training, the driver received national secuWorld Timesrity education, and some warning cases made him realize that they were indeed very suspicious.After much deliberation, he decided to report them. WheWorld Timesther they were spies or not, the driver felt it was his duty to report any suspicious activity.Approximate Time 5 minutes, 817 wordsCategoriesnational security, national secuWorld Timesrity education, illegal surveying, sensitive geographic information, sensitive fundamental geographic informationAnalysis and EvaluationA truly enlightening read, this piece cuts…
John Blinken